Competition vs altruism: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Marked this version for translation |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<translate> | <translate> | ||
= Overview = | = Overview = <!--T:1--> | ||
<!--T:2--> | |||
An {{CommunityMainName}} could choose what levels of competitiveness or altruism it builds into it's rules. | An {{CommunityMainName}} could choose what levels of competitiveness or altruism it builds into it's rules. | ||
= Competition = | = Competition = <!--T:3--> | ||
<!--T:4--> | |||
Competition means some members win and some lose, what that means would be up to the community. | Competition means some members win and some lose, what that means would be up to the community. | ||
<!--T:5--> | |||
Competition can be used as a way to push members to achieve the best outcomes, for example aggressive allocations of [[Token economy|tokens]] according to performance, the level that winners profit and losers suffer up to the community. | Competition can be used as a way to push members to achieve the best outcomes, for example aggressive allocations of [[Token economy|tokens]] according to performance, the level that winners profit and losers suffer up to the community. | ||
= [[Altruistic community]] = | = [[Altruistic community]] = <!--T:6--> | ||
<!--T:7--> | |||
A community that takes a more altruistic path where members do not need to compete against each other but rather all members are viewed as valuable could use different methods to achieve strong outcomes. | A community that takes a more altruistic path where members do not need to compete against each other but rather all members are viewed as valuable could use different methods to achieve strong outcomes. | ||
<!--T:8--> | |||
Education would be important and rules that require [[Strong work ethic|reasonable input]] could be implemented, [[Productive time management|allocation of tasks]] could be decided on by performance. | Education would be important and rules that require [[Strong work ethic|reasonable input]] could be implemented, [[Productive time management|allocation of tasks]] could be decided on by performance. | ||
<!--T:9--> | |||
An argument for creating a more altruistic community is it reinforces reducing [[Concentration of power|concentrations of power]] as helps equalize all members worth, it reduces the fall into selfish [[Greed and materialism]] and allows people to [[Productive time management|focus their time]] on core goals of the community, such as becoming a replacement for existing governing systems that promote evil behavior. | An argument for creating a more altruistic community is it reinforces reducing [[Concentration of power|concentrations of power]] as helps equalize all members worth, it reduces the fall into selfish [[Greed and materialism]] and allows people to [[Productive time management|focus their time]] on core goals of the community, such as becoming a replacement for existing governing systems that promote evil behavior. | ||
= Related concepts = | = Related concepts = <!--T:10--> | ||
<!--T:11--> | |||
* [[Altruistic community]] | * [[Altruistic community]] | ||
* [[Token economy]] | * [[Token economy]] | ||
= Related reasonings = | = Related reasonings = <!--T:12--> | ||
<!--T:13--> | |||
* [[Survival of the fittest]] | * [[Survival of the fittest]] | ||
* [[The animal nature of humans]] | * [[The animal nature of humans]] | ||
<!--T:14--> | |||
[[Category:Reasonings]] | [[Category:Reasonings]] | ||
</translate> | </translate> |
Revision as of 01:40, 4 November 2024
Overview
An Izara Community could choose what levels of competitiveness or altruism it builds into it's rules.
Competition
Competition means some members win and some lose, what that means would be up to the community.
Competition can be used as a way to push members to achieve the best outcomes, for example aggressive allocations of tokens according to performance, the level that winners profit and losers suffer up to the community.
Altruistic community
A community that takes a more altruistic path where members do not need to compete against each other but rather all members are viewed as valuable could use different methods to achieve strong outcomes.
Education would be important and rules that require reasonable input could be implemented, allocation of tasks could be decided on by performance.
An argument for creating a more altruistic community is it reinforces reducing concentrations of power as helps equalize all members worth, it reduces the fall into selfish Greed and materialism and allows people to focus their time on core goals of the community, such as becoming a replacement for existing governing systems that promote evil behavior.