Enforcement of rules: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Marked this version for translation |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<translate> | <translate> | ||
<!--T:1--> | |||
{{ConceptImportanceInfobox6High}} | {{ConceptImportanceInfobox6High}} | ||
= Overview = | = Overview = | ||
<!--T:2--> | |||
Rules and the punishments for breaking them are decided by the [[Voting system]], when someone breaks a rule punishment needs to be enforced. | Rules and the punishments for breaking them are decided by the [[Voting system]], when someone breaks a rule punishment needs to be enforced. | ||
<!--T:3--> | |||
There are different steps in this process, each of which is decided by the [[Self governance|community]], they include investigation, analysis of evidence, judgement and enforcement. | There are different steps in this process, each of which is decided by the [[Self governance|community]], they include investigation, analysis of evidence, judgement and enforcement. | ||
<!--T:4--> | |||
Each of these steps creates a position of power that can be corrupted, to mitigate this the community can demand high levels of [[Transparency]] on people who are part of the enforcement process, enact strong punishments against those who abuse their power, and try to create systems that spread the power as wide as possible. | Each of these steps creates a position of power that can be corrupted, to mitigate this the community can demand high levels of [[Transparency]] on people who are part of the enforcement process, enact strong punishments against those who abuse their power, and try to create systems that spread the power as wide as possible. | ||
= Accountability = | = Accountability = <!--T:5--> | ||
<!--T:6--> | |||
Those who take on the responsibility of enforcement could be audited regularly, multiple people could be commissioned and the [[Scientific method]] used to test which achieve the best results. | Those who take on the responsibility of enforcement could be audited regularly, multiple people could be commissioned and the [[Scientific method]] used to test which achieve the best results. | ||
<!--T:7--> | |||
Regular assessments and comparative testing implemented to ensure the powerful positions do not become entrenched. | Regular assessments and comparative testing implemented to ensure the powerful positions do not become entrenched. | ||
= Sortition = | = Sortition = <!--T:8--> | ||
<!--T:9--> | |||
Analysis and judgement could be passed to the [[Issue resolution]] system that uses sortition, even investigation and enforcement steps could be handled by sortition where a random group of community members are requested to perform these acts, perhaps limited to members who have achieved a level of understanding in the skills needed to perform the task. | Analysis and judgement could be passed to the [[Issue resolution]] system that uses sortition, even investigation and enforcement steps could be handled by sortition where a random group of community members are requested to perform these acts, perhaps limited to members who have achieved a level of understanding in the skills needed to perform the task. | ||
= Related concepts = | = Related concepts = <!--T:10--> | ||
<!--T:11--> | |||
* [[Issue resolution]] | * [[Issue resolution]] | ||
* [[Distribution of power]] | * [[Distribution of power]] | ||
= Related reasonings = | = Related reasonings = <!--T:12--> | ||
<!--T:13--> | |||
* [[Resolving conflicts within the community]] | * [[Resolving conflicts within the community]] | ||
* [[Concentration of power]] | * [[Concentration of power]] | ||
<!--T:14--> | |||
[[Category:Concepts]] | [[Category:Concepts]] | ||
</translate> | </translate> | ||
Revision as of 01:31, 4 November 2024
Level 6 concept (High) - Important concept an Izara Community should implement and maintain
Overview
Rules and the punishments for breaking them are decided by the Voting system, when someone breaks a rule punishment needs to be enforced.
There are different steps in this process, each of which is decided by the community, they include investigation, analysis of evidence, judgement and enforcement.
Each of these steps creates a position of power that can be corrupted, to mitigate this the community can demand high levels of Transparency on people who are part of the enforcement process, enact strong punishments against those who abuse their power, and try to create systems that spread the power as wide as possible.
Accountability
Those who take on the responsibility of enforcement could be audited regularly, multiple people could be commissioned and the Scientific method used to test which achieve the best results.
Regular assessments and comparative testing implemented to ensure the powerful positions do not become entrenched.
Sortition
Analysis and judgement could be passed to the Issue resolution system that uses sortition, even investigation and enforcement steps could be handled by sortition where a random group of community members are requested to perform these acts, perhaps limited to members who have achieved a level of understanding in the skills needed to perform the task.