Community α - Dispute resolution: Difference between revisions

From Izara Community
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<translate>
<translate>
<!--T:1-->
{{InitialStateImportanceInfobox8VeryHigh}}
{{InitialStateImportanceInfobox8VeryHigh}}
= Overview =
= Overview =


Anyone can raise an issue against anyone else and a multi-level [[Issue resolution|sortition]] process will be implemented to decide what the solution should be.
<!--T:2-->
Anyone can raise an issue against anyone else and a multi-level [[Special:MyLanguage/Issue resolution|sortition]] process will be implemented to decide what the solution should be.


Depending on the size of the initial community an example would be seven people are chosen for a jury. If an appeal is made it is be passed to the entire community to decide upon.
<!--T:3-->
Depending on the size of the initial community an example would be seven people are chosen for a jury. If an appeal is made it is passed to the entire community to decide upon.


<!--T:4-->
If the community increases in size and appeals are too time consuming for the entire community to decide on, the second level of appeal could be limited to a reasonably large random number of members.
If the community increases in size and appeals are too time consuming for the entire community to decide on, the second level of appeal could be limited to a reasonably large random number of members.


<!--T:5-->
In early stages there will not be clear solutions for different issues, a body of resolutions will begin to form as the process matures.
In early stages there will not be clear solutions for different issues, a body of resolutions will begin to form as the process matures.


<!--T:6-->
The jury will decide using range choice voting, any number of possible solutions can be presented by any member of the community, and the jury members can enter their preferences at any time, once all jury members submit their selections the most popular resolution is implemented.
The jury will decide using range choice voting, any number of possible solutions can be presented by any member of the community, and the jury members can enter their preferences at any time, once all jury members submit their selections the most popular resolution is implemented.


<!--T:7-->
Any party can then appeal that decision immediately, if an appeal is made the resolution is put on hold until the appeal is complete. Appeals can also be made at any later date.
Any party can then appeal that decision immediately, if an appeal is made the resolution is put on hold until the appeal is complete. Appeals can also be made at any later date.


<!--T:8-->
The same system can be used to police misuse of the appeal system, people who waste resources with frivolous appeals can have issues raised against them for that behavior and the community decide how to penalize it.
The same system can be used to police misuse of the appeal system, people who waste resources with frivolous appeals can have issues raised against them for that behavior and the community decide how to penalize it.


= Related initial states =
= Related initial states = <!--T:9-->


* [[Community α - Voting system]]
<!--T:10-->
* [[Community α - Enforcement of rules]]
* [[Special:MyLanguage/Community α - Voting system|Community α - Voting system]]
* [[Special:MyLanguage/Community α - Enforcement of rules|Community α - Enforcement of rules]]


= Related concepts =
= Related concepts = <!--T:11-->


* [[Issue resolution]]
<!--T:12-->
* [[Special:MyLanguage/Issue resolution|Issue resolution]]


= Related reasonings =
= Related reasonings = <!--T:13-->


* [[Resolving conflicts within the community]]
<!--T:14-->
* [[Special:MyLanguage/Resolving conflicts within the community|Resolving conflicts within the community]]
</translate>


[[Category:Initial states]]
[[Category:Initial states{{#translation:}}|D]]
 
</translate>

Latest revision as of 11:41, 2 February 2025

Level 8 (Very high) - Initial implementation of the Community α (Thailand) will strive to implement

Overview

Anyone can raise an issue against anyone else and a multi-level sortition process will be implemented to decide what the solution should be.

Depending on the size of the initial community an example would be seven people are chosen for a jury. If an appeal is made it is passed to the entire community to decide upon.

If the community increases in size and appeals are too time consuming for the entire community to decide on, the second level of appeal could be limited to a reasonably large random number of members.

In early stages there will not be clear solutions for different issues, a body of resolutions will begin to form as the process matures.

The jury will decide using range choice voting, any number of possible solutions can be presented by any member of the community, and the jury members can enter their preferences at any time, once all jury members submit their selections the most popular resolution is implemented.

Any party can then appeal that decision immediately, if an appeal is made the resolution is put on hold until the appeal is complete. Appeals can also be made at any later date.

The same system can be used to police misuse of the appeal system, people who waste resources with frivolous appeals can have issues raised against them for that behavior and the community decide how to penalize it.

Related initial states

Related concepts

Related reasonings