Issue resolution - Revision history

Sven the Barbarian at 12:22, 10 November 2024

2024-11-10T12:22:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:22, 10 November 2024
Line 77:		Line 77:
	</translate>		</translate>

	[[Category:Concepts]]		[[Category:Concepts{{#translation:}}]]

Sven the Barbarian at 15:47, 9 November 2024

2024-11-09T15:47:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:47, 9 November 2024
Line 61:		Line 61:

	<!--T:23-->		<!--T:23-->
	Because members of the community are expected to partake in the conflict resolution process which to operate fairly requires an understanding of laws, rules, and rational thinking, this should be incorporated into the [[Education of community members]].		Because members of the community are expected to partake in the conflict resolution process which to operate fairly requires an understanding of laws, rules, and rational thinking, this should be incorporated into the [[Special:MyLanguage/Education of community members\|education of community members]].

	= Compensation for jury work = <!--T:24-->		= Compensation for jury work = <!--T:24-->
Line 74:		Line 74:

	<!--T:28-->		<!--T:28-->
	* [[Resolving conflicts within the community]]		* [[Special:MyLanguage/Resolving conflicts within the community\|Resolving conflicts within the community]]
			</translate>

	~~<!--T:29-->~~
	[[Category:Concepts]]		[[Category:Concepts]]

	~~</translate>~~

Sven the Barbarian: Marked this version for translation

2024-11-04T01:31:45Z

Marked this version for translation

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:31, 4 November 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<translate>		<translate>
			<!--T:1-->
	{{ConceptImportanceInfobox8VeryHigh}}		{{ConceptImportanceInfobox8VeryHigh}}
	= Overview =		= Overview =

			<!--T:2-->
	A community driven issue resolution process that ensures all members of society achieve equal access to a fair legal system, where decisions are based on the current beliefs of the community.		A community driven issue resolution process that ensures all members of society achieve equal access to a fair legal system, where decisions are based on the current beliefs of the community.

	= Multiple levels of sortition =		= Multiple levels of sortition = <!--T:3-->

			<!--T:4-->
	Any person can raise an issue that gets assigned a jury using sortition, at the early levels the sortition could include all members of society.		Any person can raise an issue that gets assigned a jury using sortition, at the early levels the sortition could include all members of society.

			<!--T:5-->
	If any party feels the decision of the first level was unjust they can appeal the decision to a higher level of sortition, higher levels might include more jury members or people who would likely have a better understanding of the rules and concepts the community adheres to, eg elder members.		If any party feels the decision of the first level was unjust they can appeal the decision to a higher level of sortition, higher levels might include more jury members or people who would likely have a better understanding of the rules and concepts the community adheres to, eg elder members.

			<!--T:6-->
	The number of jury members and pool of community members chosen from at each level, and the number of sortition levels is decided on by the community.		The number of jury members and pool of community members chosen from at each level, and the number of sortition levels is decided on by the community.

			<!--T:7-->
	The community could decide that jurors are only selected from people who have shown a level of understanding of justice and rational decision making, however care should be taken not to restrict the selection pool, as the large the population to choose from the less centralized justice becomes		The community could decide that jurors are only selected from people who have shown a level of understanding of justice and rational decision making, however care should be taken not to restrict the selection pool, as the large the population to choose from the less centralized justice becomes

	== Cost of appealing to a higher level ==		== Cost of appealing to a higher level == <!--T:8-->

			<!--T:9-->
	If the process becomes overwhelmed with appeals a cost could be introduced for making an unsuccessful appeal.		If the process becomes overwhelmed with appeals a cost could be introduced for making an unsuccessful appeal.

			<!--T:10-->
	An alternative is if someone makes unfounded appeals other people in the community could raise an issue against them for this behavior, which in term might have punishments judged against the offender.		An alternative is if someone makes unfounded appeals other people in the community could raise an issue against them for this behavior, which in term might have punishments judged against the offender.

	= New evidence =		= New evidence = <!--T:11-->

			<!--T:12-->
	If new evidence is uncovered for a previously decided case, a new issue could be raised referring to the previous judgement.		If new evidence is uncovered for a previously decided case, a new issue could be raised referring to the previous judgement.

			<!--T:13-->
	As with any issue raised if someone is abusing the issue resolution system be raising unfounded issues, an issue could be raised against them for this behavior.		As with any issue raised if someone is abusing the issue resolution system be raising unfounded issues, an issue could be raised against them for this behavior.

	= Ambiguous cases =		= Ambiguous cases = <!--T:14-->

			<!--T:15-->
	Issues where guilt is not clear, half way punishments or warnings could be applied according to the level of evidence, this allows for a jury to judge someone as possibly guilty with some punishment, rather than releasing them with no guilt or punishing them with full guilt.		Issues where guilt is not clear, half way punishments or warnings could be applied according to the level of evidence, this allows for a jury to judge someone as possibly guilty with some punishment, rather than releasing them with no guilt or punishing them with full guilt.

			<!--T:16-->
	If new evidence arises that punishment could be remedied.		If new evidence arises that punishment could be remedied.

	= Additional investigation =		= Additional investigation = <!--T:17-->

			<!--T:18-->
	The community could assign the task of finding additional evidence to parties, similar to any other task of responsibility those parties can be assessed and changed according to the communities desire.		The community could assign the task of finding additional evidence to parties, similar to any other task of responsibility those parties can be assessed and changed according to the communities desire.

			<!--T:19-->
	A jury that requires additional information could task those parties as required. If juries task an unreasonable amount of work to investigators they themselves could have an issue raised against them.		A jury that requires additional information could task those parties as required. If juries task an unreasonable amount of work to investigators they themselves could have an issue raised against them.

	= Implementation =		= Implementation = <!--T:20-->

			<!--T:21-->
	Technology should be developed to make the issue resolution process run as effectively as possible, so lack of resources does not become a hindrance.		Technology should be developed to make the issue resolution process run as effectively as possible, so lack of resources does not become a hindrance.

	= Education =		= Education = <!--T:22-->

			<!--T:23-->
	Because members of the community are expected to partake in the conflict resolution process which to operate fairly requires an understanding of laws, rules, and rational thinking, this should be incorporated into the [[Education of community members]].		Because members of the community are expected to partake in the conflict resolution process which to operate fairly requires an understanding of laws, rules, and rational thinking, this should be incorporated into the [[Education of community members]].

	= Compensation for jury work =		= Compensation for jury work = <!--T:24-->

			<!--T:25-->
	The community can choose to compensate jury members if evidence shows doing so achieves more attention to the case and thus better outcomes.		The community can choose to compensate jury members if evidence shows doing so achieves more attention to the case and thus better outcomes.

			<!--T:26-->
	A system that ensures normal work activities of jury members gets assigned to others during the process could be implemented.		A system that ensures normal work activities of jury members gets assigned to others during the process could be implemented.

	= Related reasonings =		= Related reasonings = <!--T:27-->

			<!--T:28-->
	* [[Resolving conflicts within the community]]		* [[Resolving conflicts within the community]]

			<!--T:29-->
	[[Category:Concepts]]		[[Category:Concepts]]

	</translate>		</translate>

Sven the Barbarian at 01:28, 4 November 2024

2024-11-04T01:28:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:28, 4 November 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
			<translate>
	{{ConceptImportanceInfobox8VeryHigh}}		{{ConceptImportanceInfobox8VeryHigh}}
	= Overview =		= Overview =
Line 57:		Line 58:

	[[Category:Concepts]]		[[Category:Concepts]]

			</translate>

Sven the Barbarian: Created page with "{{ConceptImportanceInfobox8VeryHigh}} = Overview = A community driven issue resolution process that ensures all members of society achieve equal access to a fair legal system, where decisions are based on the current beliefs of the community. = Multiple levels of sortition = Any person can raise an issue that gets assigned a jury using sortition, at the early levels the sortition could include all members of society. If any party feels the decision of the first level..."

2024-10-14T03:50:11Z

Created page with "{{ConceptImportanceInfobox8VeryHigh}} = Overview = A community driven issue resolution process that ensures all members of society achieve equal access to a fair legal system, where decisions are based on the current beliefs of the community. = Multiple levels of sortition = Any person can raise an issue that gets assigned a jury using sortition, at the early levels the sortition could include all members of society. If any party feels the decision of the first level..."

New page

{{ConceptImportanceInfobox8VeryHigh}}
= Overview =

A community driven issue resolution process that ensures all members of society achieve equal access to a fair legal system, where decisions are based on the current beliefs of the community.

= Multiple levels of sortition =

Any person can raise an issue that gets assigned a jury using sortition, at the early levels the sortition could include all members of society.

If any party feels the decision of the first level was unjust they can appeal the decision to a higher level of sortition, higher levels might include more jury members or people who would likely have a better understanding of the rules and concepts the community adheres to, eg elder members.

The number of jury members and pool of community members chosen from at each level, and the number of sortition levels is decided on by the community.

The community could decide that jurors are only selected from people who have shown a level of understanding of justice and rational decision making, however care should be taken not to restrict the selection pool, as the large the population to choose from the less centralized justice becomes

== Cost of appealing to a higher level ==

If the process becomes overwhelmed with appeals a cost could be introduced for making an unsuccessful appeal.

An alternative is if someone makes unfounded appeals other people in the community could raise an issue against them for this behavior, which in term might have punishments judged against the offender.

= New evidence =

If new evidence is uncovered for a previously decided case, a new issue could be raised referring to the previous judgement.

As with any issue raised if someone is abusing the issue resolution system be raising unfounded issues, an issue could be raised against them for this behavior.

= Ambiguous cases =

Issues where guilt is not clear, half way punishments or warnings could be applied according to the level of evidence, this allows for a jury to judge someone as possibly guilty with some punishment, rather than releasing them with no guilt or punishing them with full guilt.

If new evidence arises that punishment could be remedied.

= Additional investigation =

The community could assign the task of finding additional evidence to parties, similar to any other task of responsibility those parties can be assessed and changed according to the communities desire.

A jury that requires additional information could task those parties as required. If juries task an unreasonable amount of work to investigators they themselves could have an issue raised against them.

= Implementation =

Technology should be developed to make the issue resolution process run as effectively as possible, so lack of resources does not become a hindrance.

= Education =

Because members of the community are expected to partake in the conflict resolution process which to operate fairly requires an understanding of laws, rules, and rational thinking, this should be incorporated into the [[Education of community members]].

= Compensation for jury work =

The community can choose to compensate jury members if evidence shows doing so achieves more attention to the case and thus better outcomes.

A system that ensures normal work activities of jury members gets assigned to others during the process could be implemented.

= Related reasonings =

* [[Resolving conflicts within the community]]

[[Category:Concepts]]