Coercion - Revision history

Sven the Barbarian at 13:44, 17 November 2025

2025-11-17T13:44:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:44, 17 November 2025
Line 6:		Line 6:

	<!--T:3-->		<!--T:3-->
	An {{CommunityMainName}} can mitigate the danger of coercion by enforcing ~~an any~~-coercion ~~stance~~ that can be enforced through the issue resolution process.		An {{CommunityMainName}} can mitigate the danger of coercion by enforcing anti-coercion rules that can be enforced through the issue resolution process.

	<!--T:4-->		<!--T:4-->

Sven the Barbarian at 12:19, 10 November 2024

2024-11-10T12:19:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:19, 10 November 2024
Line 36:		Line 36:
	</translate>		</translate>

	[[Category:Reasonings]]		[[Category:Reasonings{{#translation:}}]]

Sven the Barbarian at 03:34, 10 November 2024

2024-11-10T03:34:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:34, 10 November 2024
Line 14:		Line 14:

	<!--T:6-->		<!--T:6-->
	The [[Issue resolution]] process can be initiated by any person who feels themselves or somebody else is being unduly coerced, the community can then deal with this in the way they have decided it should be dealt with.		The [[Special:MyLanguage/Issue resolution\|issue resolution]] process can be initiated by any person who feels themselves or somebody else is being unduly coerced, the community can then deal with this in the way they have decided it should be dealt with.

	= Defining coercion = <!--T:7-->		= Defining coercion = <!--T:7-->
Line 27:		Line 27:

	<!--T:11-->		<!--T:11-->
	* [[Enforcement of rules]]		* [[Special:MyLanguage/Enforcement of rules\|Enforcement of rules]]
	* [[Issue resolution]]		* [[Special:MyLanguage/Issue resolution\|Issue resolution]]

	= Related reasonings = <!--T:12-->		= Related reasonings = <!--T:12-->

	<!--T:13-->		<!--T:13-->
	* [[Manipulation]]		* [[Special:MyLanguage/Manipulation\|Manipulation]]
			</translate>

	~~<!--T:14-->~~
	[[Category:Reasonings]]		[[Category:Reasonings]]

	~~</translate>~~

Sven the Barbarian: Marked this version for translation

2024-11-04T01:39:47Z

Marked this version for translation

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:39, 4 November 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<translate>		<translate>
	= Overview =		= Overview = <!--T:1-->

			<!--T:2-->
	When a transparent public voting system is implemented the danger or coercion is increased because the coercer can verify whether a vote was placed according to their demands.		When a transparent public voting system is implemented the danger or coercion is increased because the coercer can verify whether a vote was placed according to their demands.

			<!--T:3-->
	An {{CommunityMainName}} can mitigate the danger of coercion by enforcing an any-coercion stance that can be enforced through the issue resolution process.		An {{CommunityMainName}} can mitigate the danger of coercion by enforcing an any-coercion stance that can be enforced through the issue resolution process.

			<!--T:4-->
	Clear cases of coercion should be easily defined and policed by the community, meaning the threat of coercion can be mitigated to the point it does not threaten the integrity of self governance, and the public vote needed to ensure the system is not compromised.		Clear cases of coercion should be easily defined and policed by the community, meaning the threat of coercion can be mitigated to the point it does not threaten the integrity of self governance, and the public vote needed to ensure the system is not compromised.

	= Mitigating coercion through punishment =		= Mitigating coercion through punishment = <!--T:5-->

			<!--T:6-->
	The [[Issue resolution]] process can be initiated by any person who feels themselves or somebody else is being unduly coerced, the community can then deal with this in the way they have decided it should be dealt with.		The [[Issue resolution]] process can be initiated by any person who feels themselves or somebody else is being unduly coerced, the community can then deal with this in the way they have decided it should be dealt with.

	= Defining coercion =		= Defining coercion = <!--T:7-->

			<!--T:8-->
	Coercion is persuading someone to vote using force or threats. The community will decide what constitutes a threat, for example is an individual saying they will not talk to someone again if they vote a certain way a threat, or is it that individual's right to choose who they talk to?		Coercion is persuading someone to vote using force or threats. The community will decide what constitutes a threat, for example is an individual saying they will not talk to someone again if they vote a certain way a threat, or is it that individual's right to choose who they talk to?

			<!--T:9-->
	These types of definitions will develop and evolve over time.		These types of definitions will develop and evolve over time.

	= Related concepts =		= Related concepts = <!--T:10-->

			<!--T:11-->
	* [[Enforcement of rules]]		* [[Enforcement of rules]]
	* [[Issue resolution]]		* [[Issue resolution]]

	= Related reasonings =		= Related reasonings = <!--T:12-->

			<!--T:13-->
	* [[Manipulation]]		* [[Manipulation]]

			<!--T:14-->
	[[Category:Reasonings]]		[[Category:Reasonings]]

	</translate>		</translate>

Sven the Barbarian at 01:37, 4 November 2024

2024-11-04T01:37:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:37, 4 November 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
			<translate>
	= Overview =		= Overview =

Line 27:		Line 28:

	[[Category:Reasonings]]		[[Category:Reasonings]]

			</translate>

Sven the Barbarian: Created page with "= Overview = When a transparent public voting system is implemented the danger or coercion is increased because the coercer can verify whether a vote was placed according to their demands. An {{CommunityMainName}} can mitigate the danger of coercion by enforcing an any-coercion stance that can be enforced through the issue resolution process. Clear cases of coercion should be easily defined and policed by the community, meaning the threat of coercion can be mitigated..."

2024-10-14T02:48:46Z

Created page with "= Overview = When a transparent public voting system is implemented the danger or coercion is increased because the coercer can verify whether a vote was placed according to their demands. An {{CommunityMainName}} can mitigate the danger of coercion by enforcing an any-coercion stance that can be enforced through the issue resolution process. Clear cases of coercion should be easily defined and policed by the community, meaning the threat of coercion can be mitigated..."

New page

= Overview =

When a transparent public voting system is implemented the danger or coercion is increased because the coercer can verify whether a vote was placed according to their demands.

An {{CommunityMainName}} can mitigate the danger of coercion by enforcing an any-coercion stance that can be enforced through the issue resolution process.

Clear cases of coercion should be easily defined and policed by the community, meaning the threat of coercion can be mitigated to the point it does not threaten the integrity of self governance, and the public vote needed to ensure the system is not compromised.

= Mitigating coercion through punishment =

The [[Issue resolution]] process can be initiated by any person who feels themselves or somebody else is being unduly coerced, the community can then deal with this in the way they have decided it should be dealt with.

= Defining coercion =

Coercion is persuading someone to vote using force or threats. The community will decide what constitutes a threat, for example is an individual saying they will not talk to someone again if they vote a certain way a threat, or is it that individual's right to choose who they talk to?

These types of definitions will develop and evolve over time.

= Related concepts =

* [[Enforcement of rules]]
* [[Issue resolution]]

= Related reasonings =

* [[Manipulation]]

[[Category:Reasonings]]